Listen to #Hashtag Hong Kong every Sunday morning at 8.15
Focussing on issues affecting civil society, we'll hear from representatives of NGOs, associations, statutory bodies, and non-profit groups.
(Sundays 8.15am - 8.25am)
We are pleased to share in Hashtag Hong Kong on an important topic of child protection. This year is our 45th Anniversary. Our mission is to promote a caring and non-violent environment for the optimal growth and development of our children through quality services in prevention, crisis intervention, treatment, training and advocacy.
On gravity of the problem, from year 2011 to 2019, there were around 800 to 900 cases of child abuse every year. This number has been increased by 45% last year to over 1,400 cases. Then you may ask why?
One of the reasons is increased public awareness, from high profile cases in 2018 and 2019. There was an increase in identification and reporting of abuse. In 2019, the Law Reform Commission issued a consultation paper ‘’Failure to Protect Offence.’’ This new offence tackles the question of ‘’which of you did it’’ in serious abuse or child deaths investigations. And a reference chapter on Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse was included as additional information.
In 2020, professional awareness was heightened when the ‘’Procedural Guide for Multi-disciplinary Co-operation’’ was published by the Social Welfare Department, and delineation of roles and responsibilities of professionals was clearly made.
Then in 2020 the pandemic COVID-19 led to family conflicts, job insecurity, children at risk of sexual abuse online etc, adding to the toll of child abuse. Then in 2021, the community was shocked to know that 40 children were abused in a residential child home. So you can see how vulnerable children are in the society.
Even worse, it was estimated that only 1% of abuse cases come to the attention of professionals. Therefore, to save lives, early identification, reporting and intervention are vital. ACA has advocated Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse for some 20 years. In 2013, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child recommended Hong Kong to establish a mandatory reporting mechanism. In 2019, our Ombudsman suggested the same. Soon followed were Government consultations, debates, dialogues and forums among legislators, professional bodies and the community. Now the Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse Ordinance was finally passed and will be in full effect in January 2026. A simple message – ‘’if you see a problem, you must step forward and ask for help.’’
The main causes of child abuse is a complex issue, multifactorial in origin. Poverty, domestic violence, lack of social support, financial difficulties, parents with mental health problems, drug taking, teenage pregnancies, parents abused as a child, unplanned pregnancy or early separation from parents are risk factors of child abuse. Online child sexual abuse and exploitation is another pressing concern. Such risks easily escalate if proper assistance is not rendered.
The word to remember about the long-term effects of child abuse is ACE - Adverse Childhood Experiences. In 1998, Dr Vincent Felitti and colleagues reported the relationships between the ACEs and leading causes of child deaths. There are seven ACEs: 1)psychological abuse, 2)physical abuse, or 3)sexual abuse; 4)violence against mother and household members who were 5)substance abusers, 6)mentally ill or suicidal, and 7)ever has been imprisoned. The more ACEs you have as a child, the more problems you have in adulthood, like diseases of the heart, lung and liver, cancer and bone fractures. People with 4 or more ACEs, had 4- to 12-fold increased health risks for alcoholism, drug abuse, depression, and suicide attempt in adulthood when compared to people with none.
In a study by the Centre of Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, the estimated average lifetime cost per victim of non-fatal child abuse, including childhood health care costs, adult medical costs, productivity losses, child welfare, criminal justice and special education costs was USD830,000 in 2015. The estimated average lifetime cost per abuse death was USD 16.6 million.
We advocate a number of issues. The institutional child abuse in 2021 was a serious wake up call. ACA has a strong view that each child-related organisation should establish its own ‘’organizational child protection policy’’. Our Child Protection Institute was established in 2013 works with organizations on this, such policy will greatly safeguard our children.
The Report by Law Reform Commission in 2021, ‘’Failure to Protect Offence’’ needs to be enacted soon to provide deterrence to those who knowingly fail to protect a child from serious harm or death. Further, the maximum penalty under section 27 of the Offences against the Person Ordinance should be reviewed. This has been recommended by the court in recent years.
There are many more to do in child protection. Our other advocacies include total banning of corporal punishment, child central databank to inform policies and practices, online safety for children, home visitation service for at-risk children which is well proven in its effectiveness in child abuse prevention, a comprehensive Child Ordinance and Child Policy.
To end with an important note, when we work with children, their best interest must take priority.
Lastly this morning, I would like to dedicate a song 小時候 by 路家敏 to remind us all our precious childhood moments.
As the government has announced the “ Waste Blueprint for HK 2035 “ to tackle the challenge of waste management as well as to build a circular economy and a sustainable green living environment, “Waste Reduction” is on the top priority list. The government has proposed a measure to regulate disposable plastic tableware in phases. The Amendment Bill for the first phase of regulation was thus passed in March 2023 and will be in force on April 22, 2024.
Under the Regulation, nine types of disposable plastic tableware would be introduced.
In the first phase under the Regulation, EPS tableware, plastic straws, stirrers, cutlery and plates are prohibited to sell to end-consumers and prohibited to provide by catering premises to customers for dine-in and takeaway services. The other disposable plastic tableware such as plates, cups food containers etc, will come into force in the second phase, but the date of implementation has yet to be determined.
There are a few issues which the catering industry is concerned upon the introduction of the ban on using plastic disposable materials. The catering industry at first worried if there were alternative products to substitute the plastic tableware, and whether those environmental substitutes would increase the operating cost.
Accordingly, if we look at the website of the Environmental Protection Department, we find that at the moment 64 companies are carrying 737 items which cover a wide range of non-plastic disposable tableware. Restaurant operators do have a lot of varieties to choose from which would suit their needs.
However, many restaurant operators are, at the moment, not eager to use non-plastic tableware as the government is giving a six-month grace period to the trade, such that operators will not be fined if they do not follow the regulation on and after April 22. On the other hand, it would give enough time for importers and wholesalers as well as retailers to consume or or deal with their inventories within the allowable period. This period would also offer more time for the catering industry to find more suitable products to suit their budget and needs.
In general, the cost of environmentally disposable products is about 20-30% more expensive than the plastic ones. Take the straws for example, a few cents increase seems not much for each straw, but it can translate to a substantial percentage increase when large quantities of straws are to be consumed. Since almost all non-plastic disposable products are imported, importers and wholesalers are not willing to take the risk of keeping too much stock in their warehouses at the moment. However, we believe that costs will come down when all restaurants have adopted the practice due to the larger quantity imports.
Another concern is the quality of the substitutes. Those non-plastic substitutes are commonly made of paper, bamboo, softwood, wood pulp and plant fibre materials. Though there are a lot of choices for each type of utensil, the quality of the product varies. Some customers have complained that the paper straws or spoons cannot sustain in higher temperatures nor cannot be put in liquid for too long as they will become soft. Of course, we can find better quality products in the market, but the cost will then be higher.
As the date for launching is drawing near, the catering industry has thought of ways to deal with the situation. Large restaurant groups, such as fast food chains, hotels and high-end restaurants have started using non-plastic utensils. Even though the cost, in general, is higher, they are willing to do so as it’s a social responsibility to compile with the ESG initiative. Some restaurants simply do not provide disposable utensils, but charge customers upon their request. Some restaurants or coffee shops have started to encourage customers to bring their utensils; in such cases, restaurants will save on the cost of providing the materials, while customers do not need to pay additional to the restaurants for getting non-plastic disposable tableware.
There are about 18,000 restaurant outlets in HK, and 98% of those are small and medium-sized enterprises. With the present gloomy economic environment, these SMEs would be very cautious about the increased expenses if environmental products are used. However, I would suggest to them to use more reusable products to lower their cost and not provide the disposable utensils to customers.
After all, the bill has passed, we, as an individual should do more for the environment. I also believe that education and publicity are vital means to pass the message to the public. The government should without any hesitation, launch more programs and publicities to educate the public how to deal with the change of living habits as well as to let people understand our environment is at risk if we do not act now.
I'd like to share this song with you all this morning, I want to dedicate "Somewhere over the Rainbow" by Judy Garland. Thank you for listening.